Agreed, except the wife of a confuso who's having it off in gay bathhouses may well raise "informed" as big issue.
-
-
let's reducio ad absurdum. What about personality defects, possible genetic defects, nasty relatives?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Nothing absurd there. No reason to suppose people want to know that sort of thing right from the get go.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
argument technique to explore a proposition. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I know what a reductio is - but the conclusion has to be absurd for it to work! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not at all, you merely have to ask, "What would happen if we took this to an absurd extreme?"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, that's a textbook example of question begging, since we are precisely disagreeing about what is "absurd".
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well, I'm not using a contrary example, so it isn't really reducio ad absurdum I suppose.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rckiser
Not a reductio partly because I don't think it's absurd to disclose shoe size, eg., if you genuinely thought they'd want to know.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Very sensible! Sorry I've lost track of all my responses. I'll have to stop. Thanks for responding!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.