Here's a tweeted thought experiment...
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
First proposition: A sexual encounter in the absence of informed consent is always immoral (& assault, even if it doesn't reach legal bar).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
2nd prop: Informed consent exists only if you disclose everything a reasonable person would anticipate your partner would want to know.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
A married person cheats on their spouse, doesn't inform them, and carries on having sex with them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
Is that sexual assault? If it isn't, where does the reasoning go wrong?
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I think I could concede both those points, yet still think there's a problem in case I describe (not casual, not passion).
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
Important for Kantian reasons: if we withhold what they would consider pertinent info, we deprive of rational autonomy, etc
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.