And once again, this is complete nonsense. There is no such thing as an inviolate sociological definition.pic.twitter.com/ZGFtadbwje
-
It's not about whether a definition is "correct" - you can define things how you like - it's...
about (a) it's theoretico-logical coherence; (b) it's utility; & (c) scope. The problem here is
-
-
the insistence (a) that there is a definitive sociological definition; (b) that this somehow...
-
magically fixes the meaning of the term so that all other usages are incorrect.
-
.........that's what I said. :)
-
You were my inspiration! :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.