@PhilosophyExp Q: Does the existence of transgenderism not refute radfem core doctrine of gender being a social construct?
-
-
Replying to @Phrenologicus
@Phrenologicus Sorry, I don't follow. Why would it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp if it's "only" a social construct, a "performance", how could it then be an innate disposition in a newborn?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Phrenologicus
@Phrenologicus This stuff is too complicated for twitter! :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp hm, who could answer such a q then? or rather: where to ask?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Phrenologicus
@Phrenologicus Trouble is, you won't get a consensus - radical feminism isn't a monolith, and the place of biology in feminist theory is a
7:13 AM - 8 Jun 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.