Also, what exactly does "there will not be inequality with respect to rights, but difference, since there is a natural difference" mean...?
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp heady (deeply misguided) idealism against the backdrop of the Shah's rule -
@juliagurney Yup. To be fair, Foucault did recognise, unlike many others, that Islam was a genuinely revolutionary force. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
“
@PhilosophyExp: Foucault got badly wrong .. the liberties that would exist under Islamic govt: pic.twitter.com/F2dNS74BYc”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.