Imagine this scenario: Husband cheats on wife; she doesn't know; he continues to have sex with her; she has never indicated...
-
all relevant facts - or, at the very least, all facts that a reasonable person would expect them to take to be relevant. It seems to follow
that in this situation the husband does not have properly informed consent from his wife (and, arguably, should know he doesn't).
-
-
If that's right, following the logic of the argument, he's clealry doing wrong to his wife. Question is, then, what's the status of his act?
-
@PhilosophyExp Certainly some people (not me!) have called men in these situations -- i.e. undercover agents -- rapists. -
@AntigonesClaim Well, there is definitely something morally very dodgy about it. -
@PhilosophyExp Absolutely...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp And vice-versa re wife/husband, wife/wife, husband/husband.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.