the more they are complicit in a patriarchal construction. This goes for men *and* women. So if you read about the history of 2nd wave
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
you'll find there was a lot of painful wrestling with the issue of whether identifying as heterosexual, particuarly in the form that
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
heterosexuality takes in extant patriarchal socities, is a betrayal of feminist ideals.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
In sum, then, gender norms in patriarchal society are both constitutive of what it means to be a "woman" in those societies, and they are
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
coercive, contingent and a barrier to genuine female emancipation. If you identify with those norms, etc, then you are in some sense
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
complicit with a patriarchal construction. That's the argument, basically - with apologies for oversimplification & lacunae.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Thanks for that very helpful. A major problem is that the biology of sex is not really that well understood yet...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ortrudethevegan
@PhilosophyExp Lots known but lots still to be known- so we don't really know yet what part it plays1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ortrudethevegan
@ortrudethevegan Well quite. And the question of biological "essentialism" is a thorny issue for 2nd wavers, etc1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Wonder if people sometimes look at this from point of view of one discipline not knowing much about others-2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ortrudethevegan Oh, definitely. Plus, it just is a very tricky & complex area. Feminism has wrestled with these issues for nearly 50 years.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.