large part patriarchal constructions. There is nothing essential about these norms, nothing that ties them to a particular biological sex.
-
heterosexuality takes in extant patriarchal socities, is a betrayal of feminist ideals.
In sum, then, gender norms in patriarchal society are both constitutive of what it means to be a "woman" in those societies, and they are
-
-
coercive, contingent and a barrier to genuine female emancipation. If you identify with those norms, etc, then you are in some sense
-
complicit with a patriarchal construction. That's the argument, basically - with apologies for oversimplification & lacunae.
-
@PhilosophyExp Thanks for that very helpful. A major problem is that the biology of sex is not really that well understood yet... -
@PhilosophyExp Lots known but lots still to be known- so we don't really know yet what part it plays -
@ortrudethevegan Well quite. And the question of biological "essentialism" is a thorny issue for 2nd wavers, etc -
@PhilosophyExp Wonder if people sometimes look at this from point of view of one discipline not knowing much about others- -
@ortrudethevegan Oh, definitely. Plus, it just is a very tricky & complex area. Feminism has wrestled with these issues for nearly 50 years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.