A brief primer in gender critical feminism & its intellectual roots (if anybody is interested). Apologies for twitter oversimplification.
-
(though this is actually a contested & tricky issue even for gender critical feminists), or shared experiences that are inextricably linked
to that biology, but it cannot be merely a matter of identifying with a particular gender (because gender is contingent and constructed).
-
-
Moreover, in a patriarcal society, to the extent that a person feels comfortable inhabiting a prescribed gender position, the more they are
-
the more they are complicit in a patriarchal construction. This goes for men *and* women. So if you read about the history of 2nd wave
-
you'll find there was a lot of painful wrestling with the issue of whether identifying as heterosexual, particuarly in the form that
-
heterosexuality takes in extant patriarchal socities, is a betrayal of feminist ideals.
-
In sum, then, gender norms in patriarchal society are both constitutive of what it means to be a "woman" in those societies, and they are
-
coercive, contingent and a barrier to genuine female emancipation. If you identify with those norms, etc, then you are in some sense
-
complicit with a patriarchal construction. That's the argument, basically - with apologies for oversimplification & lacunae.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp so it's merely "constructed" that women aren't farting, grunting brutes and men don't play bamby eyed damsels in distress?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.