@PhilosophyExp But it is falsifiable. Why just this week, I - an atheist motivated by no positive or negative concept of religion - did...
This thing, "But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion" - it's unfalsifiable, rhetorical tosh, & people shouldn't say it!
-
-
-
@pintofhemlock That begs the question vis-a-vis the unfalsifiable bit (i.e., that you're a "good" person). -
@PhilosophyExp I guess the simple response is: many motivations lead good people to do evil. We can show they are not religiously based. -
@pintofhemlock Trouble is, that's just not going to get you anywhere, because it's entirely possible to argue that what defines a "good 1/
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Umm.. well, rhetoric has it's place. And can be useful.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp wasn't it falsified by the Stanford Prison Experiment?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.