@philosophyexp Syllogism test seems flawed b/c no warning of philosophy-specific defs. In common usage, if ALL x are z SOME x are z. Not XOR
-
@PhilosophyExp I get it, & I learned something, but violating "plain meaning" just a bit like cheating. Test is meant for non-philophs, yes?
@ktris settled for including a special note on results page. Certainly, it's the mistake that most people make. So, well... don't know! :)
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Yep, read "Special Note" & figured it was a common error. As I said, I learned something. My tl;dr: "ALL" != SOME + MORE.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.