@philosophyexp Syllogism test seems flawed b/c no warning of philosophy-specific defs. In common usage, if ALL x are z SOME x are z. Not XOR
-
@PhilosophyExp I get it, & I learned something, but violating "plain meaning" just a bit like cheating. Test is meant for non-philophs, yes?
@ktris It's a difficult call. It certainly isn't fair. But, on the other hand, I don't want to ignore the existential fallacy. So I...