@PhilosophyExp Shouldn't S2 (some photographs are not cartoons) be valid? Or am I missing something?
Valid or Invalid? Test your ability to spot whether a syllogism is valid or invalid. New experiment (still in beta). http://bit.ly/1sSGoyV
-
-
-
@trilibrylnu Existential fallacy, I think. http://bit.ly/1vMu9Rp
-
@PhilosophyExp I see, so the problem is that we can't presume the existence of any photographs and so we can't say 'some', correct? -
.@trilibrylnu Yes. "All dragons breathe fire" - doesn't mean "Some (1 or more) dragons breathe fire", because the class "dragons" is empty.
-
@PhilosophyExp Ok, I considered 'some X are not Y' to be a weaker version of 'no X are Y' without realizing it implies existence. Thanks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp I thought I was doing horrible on the experiment, turns out I got all 15 correct. -
@maikeruuu_ A lot better than I manage when I go through them! :) -
@PhilosophyExp Benefits of doing a logic course I guess
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
MT “
@PhilosophyExp ... Test your ability to spot whether a syllogism is valid ... (still in beta). http://bit.ly/1sSGoyV ” average again!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.