Voting can change the lives of others dramatically. That responsibility has to be faced by making voting something people have to understand
@sjzara But why stop there? Why not exclude the 90% who don't have coherent political attitudes? http://bit.ly/1pl88oR
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Would we let someone drive who had an incoherent view of what road signs meant? -
@sjzara No. But de facto that would mean only about 10% of a mass public gets to vote (the Philip Converse study is a classic of its kind).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.