. @ThatOneGuy830 That's not Darwinism. Evolution says nothing about "good" or "bad", only the unguided mechanism of selection.
-
-
Replying to @sjzara
. @ThatOneGuy830 If anyone was daft enough to think there was a moral imperative from Darwinism, that imperative would be to do nothing!
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @sjzara
. @ThatOneGuy830 As soon as a human made a decision about "good" or "bad", that's utterly rejecting the principle of unguided selection.
4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara @ThatOneGuy830 @SelfExamineLife A decision can be made to not interfere and see who survives = unguided. Yes?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @SimonTuffen
@SimonTuffen @sjzara @ThatOneGuy830 @SelfExamineLife Yes, I think that's the most reasonable interpretation of concept of guiding/unguiding.
3:55 PM - 10 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.