@PhilosophyExp For example, "If human, then mammal" - does not suggest "if mammal, then human". There cld b several conditions of "then Q".
@lordpasternack @giggs_boson It might be misleading, but actually more people get my version right than Wason reported for his original...
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@lordpasternack@giggs_boson Could that be because some re-run the test with correct answers to re-read the explanation? -
@13bbird@lordpasternack@giggs_boson Not unless they deliberately circumvent the various checks in place to prevent the data being tainted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@giggs_boson THERE ARE SO MANY CONFOUNDING FACTORS, AND YOUR EXPERIMENT IS UNBLINDED AND... yeah, okay, it's fascinating.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.