@B100J Okay, the puzzle is logically correct. The explanation given by @PhilosophyExp, isn't. And I didn't select the yellow, only circle.
-
-
@PhilosophyExp For example, "If human, then mammal" - does not suggest "if mammal, then human". There cld b several conditions of "then Q". -
@lordpasternack Sorry, but I just don't know what you're talking about. As I say, the explanation given is correct. But thanks, anyway! :) -
@PhilosophyExp You should have said "there's no problem even if there's NOT a circle/S on the other side".pic.twitter.com/2pXUvhYpk6
-
@lordpasternack For which cards precisely? -
@PhilosophyExp The first two. Point is we don't make sure yellow goes with circle for same reason we don't make sure over 18s drink alcohol. -
@lordpasternack It does say, No prob even if circle is on other side, which is equivalent to, No prob even if drinking alcohol. -
@PhilosophyExp The point should be stressed that it doesn't matter EITHER WAY what results of that query are. It wouldn't break rule. 2/2 -
@lordpasternack@PhilosophyExp ^exactly. It's designed to deceive, no? Seems clear to me if simply explained correctly would be simple. - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp I find it hard to believe that the 3rd test is 'easier', but your results speak for themselves... -
@SIN_Notung@PhilosophyExp Got 'em all right (as always!). Yes, it's known in the literature that people find the less abstract sort easier. -
@SIN_Notung@PhilosophyExp I always find it hard to understand how people get them wrong - with care you can always puzzle them out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Your explanation says that we know that if card has Q, we KNOW P is on other side. We don't. We don't know "If Q then..."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.