@PhilosophyExp A wonderful test :)
I'll play it again. Thanks for sharing Julian :)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp That'd be easier for someone like me if you defined God at the beginning!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Settled on a definition, but now the quiz is generalising my views on absence of evidence in the cases of Nessie and God.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp And there may be other reasons I disagree that "False" to Question 11 and "True" to Question 15 means I've bitten a bullet...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp sorry, Jeremy :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@philosophersmag the simple logic causes direct hits that don't exist. You need more religious studyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp My problem. Q8, "x possible" & "x is so" are real world claims, but the answer which is valid without evidence, is different -
@PhilosophyExp Wonder if that antagonism (non accounted for by Q8) isnt the basis for probing reality (science) in the first place.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.