Dawkins proves why his haters really really need to learn about the principle of charity: https://richarddawkins.net/2014/08/abortion-down-syndrome-an-apology-for-letting-slip-the-dogs-of-twitterwar/ …
-
-
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@SIN_Notung The distinction he wants to draw between "This fetus should be aborted" & "This person should have been aborted" is... dubious.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp I think it's ok. In one sense (strictly speaking) if one is true during birth then the other will true later on. But...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@PhilosophyExp as personhood develops (i.e. value introduced) then in some way the latter statement's truth is 'eroded' away. Maybe :p2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@SIN_Notung Surely, we're not making a mistake if we later claim the fetus should have been terminated, & she was told this at the time...?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Yeah maybe. I was assuming we're talking about a valuable life that would have at the time been terminated on our advice.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@SIN_Notung But we're not. It's just it remains the case that we should have terminated what is now a valuable life before it became...etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.