Jeremy Stangroom

@SIN_Notung Of course. But how one gets to the conclusion is crucial (because of what the logic of bad argument will likely entail).

@PhilosophyExp @SIN_Notung How is the conclusion that people who don't terminate DS fetuses are immoral defensible?

@Humanisticus @SIN_Notung It would be defensible if it were true that on balance a DS life involves more suffering than quality, etc.

@PhilosophyExp @SIN_Notung Except it doesn't involve more suffering than quality, not even close, ergo it's not a defensible position.

@Humanisticus @PhilosophyExp I guess he's assuming that it is though - and wouldn't it be defensible given that assumption?

@SIN_Notung @PhilosophyExp No. You could defend him but not the argument, his statement is not defensible.

@Humanisticus @PhilosophyExp but given the assumption?

@SIN_Notung @PhilosophyExp No. A false assumption doesn't bolster an argument.