*wakes up* I agree with Dawkins.
-
@PhilosophyExp I'll have to read through the justifications (only just woken)... but isn't his conclusion a defensible one?
@SIN_Notung Of course. But how one gets to the conclusion is crucial (because of what the logic of bad argument will likely entail).
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Sure - perhaps it was a "now, what was that justification I read somewhere..." ;)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@SIN_Notung How is the conclusion that people who don't terminate DS fetuses are immoral defensible? -
@Humanisticus@SIN_Notung It would be defensible if it were true that on balance a DS life involves more suffering than quality, etc. -
@PhilosophyExp@Humanisticus Yep I agree - that would be my defence too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@SIN_Notung Its fine to abort DS fetuses cause "meh, too much effort"? -
@Ihasgelato@SIN_Notung No, that's exactly when it isn't fine. Quality of life has to be right at the centre of any argument.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.