*wakes up* I agree with Dawkins.
@SIN_Notung No you don't! :) (Not the bit where he suggests that relevant moral distinction between autism & DS is ability to contribute...)
-
-
@PhilosophyExp I'll have to read through the justifications (only just woken)... but isn't his conclusion a defensible one? -
@SIN_Notung Of course. But how one gets to the conclusion is crucial (because of what the logic of bad argument will likely entail). -
@PhilosophyExp Sure - perhaps it was a "now, what was that justification I read somewhere..." ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.