@skepteaser @toxicpath Or imagine dice. If I throw them in *exactly* the same way from the same starting point I'll get the same result, no?
-
-
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@skepteaser
@toxicpath We say it's 'random' because it's *as if* it's random to us, but actually it's physically deterministic.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@SIN_Notung@toxicpath I am not sure if we can compare random sampling errors to a throw of dice but I could be wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@SIN_Notung@toxicpath Suppose an error in gene transcription were introduced by radioactivity. You might consider the sequence of events1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@SIN_Notung@toxicpath as deterministic. However radioactive decay is completely stochastic at the atomic level.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@SIN_Notung@toxicpath There's no way to predict which atom will decay.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@SIN_Notung@toxicpath mutations by radioactivity are fairly common. Who knows how many times it had a defining effect on the course of4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@SIN_Notung@toxicpath natural history. The most tenable position is that we don't know what would happen if we reran the tape.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@skepteaser
@SIN_Notung@toxicpath decay rates, mean lifetimes, etc. Your claim relies on a single atom being crucial (I think!).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@SIN_Notung@toxicpath Yes it does. A single alpha particle can arguably affect a reproductive process.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@skepteaser Right, but *counterfactually* is a *particular* alpha particle every going to be crucial. (I'm not saying it isn't, but it's...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.