Imagine if (say) Matt Ridley wrote those exact tweets. I propose that nobody would really care. People just want to get outraged at Dawkins.
-
@PhilosophyExp the Phil. staff at my university were the same. They like his science writing but not the religion. Was a wakeup call!
@SIN_Notung Yeah, though to be fair, TGD isn't aimed at philosophy professionals, and shouldn't really be judged in those terms.
-
-
@PhilosophyExp and his philosophy lacks rigour, but his ideas can still spark discussions and be a starting point. That still has value IMO -
@SIN_Notung@PhilosophyExp Thus reaching a wide audience. Would not have done so if philosophically complex. -
@Humanisticus@PhilosophyExp but yeah - many might find a better book like (say) Mackie's a bit boring/impenetrable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.