@sjzara If all minds are physical (we've never encountered a non-physical mind), and God is a mind, then God is physical.
-
-
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@SIN_Notung I'm suggesting that all minds have to be physical.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sjzara
@sjzara@SIN_Notung But there's a difference between claiming all minds are dependent upon the physical & that all minds are only physical.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara oops, yes, so we'd have to say 'dependent on the physical ' in both cases. God is dependent on the physical.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@SIN_Notung@sjzara Well, Steve's position is that dualism is ruled out, so his is a stronger claim.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara Couldn't one think that the mind supervenes on the physical, but that it is non-physical itself, & dualism is false?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara genuine question, since I've always been fuzzy on phil. of mind.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@SIN_Notung@PhilosophyExp I have never come across a coherent definition of 'non-physical' (other than 'abstract')1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sjzara
@sjzara@PhilosophyExp I have some idea, but I can't put it into words, which probably means it's a flawed idea ;)1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@SIN_Notung@sjzara@PhilosophyExp This conversation made me think of this → http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9vzh0_olivia-newton-john-lets-get-physica_music … Not sure what that says about me :)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@mirandachale @SIN_Notung @sjzara It says all good things, Miranda, all good things. :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.