What I'm trying to get at is that God is necessarily physical!
-
@SIN_Notung I'm suggesting that all minds have to be physical.
@sjzara @SIN_Notung But there's a difference between claiming all minds are dependent upon the physical & that all minds are only physical.
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@SIN_Notung Yes. My proposition is that all minds are necessarily only physical (I'm in that kind of mood today)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara oops, yes, so we'd have to say 'dependent on the physical ' in both cases. God is dependent on the physical. -
@SIN_Notung@sjzara Well, Steve's position is that dualism is ruled out, so his is a stronger claim. -
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara Couldn't one think that the mind supervenes on the physical, but that it is non-physical itself, & dualism is false? -
@SIN_Notung@PhilosophyExp I'm trying to understand what that means. -
@sjzara@PhilosophyExp i.e. are the 3 propositions compatible: mind supervenes on physical && mind is non-physical && dualism == false;
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.