@PhilosophyExp Agreed. Problem is that case is governed by a federal statute that goes far beyond a Lockean conception of religious freedom.
Presumably people don't believe that access to contraception is a natural right...? Because that would be... well, nonsense on stilts.
-
-
-
@Metamagician Sure. But to couch a response in terms of "rights" is... well, tricky (& depends on exactly what is meant, etc). -
.
@PhilosophyExp the end of the story under Smith doctrine. Under RFRA, much harder to uphold the law. There was always going to be a prob./2 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Stilts are in fact, quite good contraceptives, not 100% but I don't know anyone got pregnant on stilts.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp I think people who don't know how contraception works shouldn't take it. They're delicate pills, easily damaging bodies.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.