If any person or group makes arrogant, authoritarian, and unreasonable demands for you to not do something, then that's a reason to do it.
-
@PhilosophyExp If that was an unreasonable demand, backed up with threats, etc, then it might be. However it's obv. a very reasonable demand
@SIN_Notung And if I demand that people shouldn't vote for UKIP? You probably see where I'm going with this...! :)
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Not actually sure about that last one - I would just try to reason with someone about their vote - not make demands. -
@PhilosophyExp I'm mostly thinking about Draw Mohammed Day. I wouldn't normally do it, but if someone says "you must not do this or else"... -
@PhilosophyExp "You must not wear Jesus & Mo t-shirts", "you must strike 'niggardly' from your vocabulary" "you must not joke about X", etc. -
@SIN_Notung It's not simply - it's important to resist "unreasonable", authoritarian demands. -
@PhilosophyExp I suppose, but a critic of DMD would say "it's not a free speech issue - we're just saying you're a <insult> for doing it" -
@PhilosophyExp but I want to argue that one can have good reason to do it - that reason based in the demands of others. -
@PhilosophyExp such demands *could* be reasonable though, and in that case we should take them more seriously. hence "unreasonable". -
@SIN_Notung And also that it might be justified to execute somebody in the face of international demands not to execute them (because of
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.