@PhilosophyExp (2) of the very same action - make the man into small enough pieces to get past / kill the man. Too close to be (...)
-
-
-
@drmichaelrush Foot takes it to be a limit case to show you can't simply redescribe the action as "blasting him out of the cave", for 1/
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp it's meant as a limit case to show that it would be absurd to apply the DDE to cases were you've given 2 descriptions (1)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp (3/3) realistically thought of as an action and its foreseen but unintended consequence.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp That DDE/double standard rule is a mind trap. View is always as if "from gods eye view" attempting to dodge guilty action.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.