@SkepticismFirst @sjzara Surely this bit of argument doesn't work: "Unless you can prove Eric doesn't exist, God doesn't exist." Even given
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@SkepticismFirst@sjzara I just read it and was *just* about to say exactly that. Damn you!3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@SIN_Notung@SkepticismFirst@sjzara Yeah, basically nothing *logically* follows from the fact I can't prove Eric's non-existence.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@SIN_Notung@SkepticismFirst The flaws are even more clear if you just replace Eric with 'anti-god principle'1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable
Replying to @SkepticismFirst
@SkepticismFirst By the way, your argument was clever and to the point (I thought I ought to say that!). :)
8:28 PM - 13 Jan 2014
1 reply
0 retweets
2 likes
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.