@SkepticismFirst @sjzara Surely this bit of argument doesn't work: "Unless you can prove Eric doesn't exist, God doesn't exist." Even given
@SIN_Notung @SkepticismFirst @sjzara Yeah, basically nothing *logically* follows from the fact I can't prove Eric's non-existence.
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@SIN_Notung@SkepticismFirst The flaws are even more clear if you just replace Eric with 'anti-god principle' -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@SkepticismFirst By the way, your argument was clever and to the point (I thought I ought to say that!). :) -
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.