@sjzara Well that's part of the gap, of course. Most physicalists would concede that we're not yet able to account for what seems...
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Thank you - I'll search for it! I'm an (amateur, of course!) physicalist and I agree.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Is that in your book of interviews, co-authored with Baggini? I have that.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Thank you... I'll start looking this stuff up!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sjzara
@sjzara The thing you really want to look at, if you haven't yet, is Anomalous Monism. http://stanford.io/1d78jyI (Honderich is more marginal.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp I know! But it's something I have been interested in all my life. Great to now know people with expertise, like you!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp That's more than me - I appreciate it.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.