@PhilosophyExp that their methods were complementary. Part of the prob is that religion was not really using such methods - so it seems! /3
-
-
Replying to @Metamagician
@Metamagician Sorry, bit hopeless coz of twitter limitation. Good to see you arguing "accommodationist" postion, though. ;)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp In some other logically possible world, science might have confirmed some religion or other as probably the true one.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Metamagician
@Metamagician Ibn Sina were attacked (it's the threat, the recognition that if push came to shove, a choice would need to be made, etc). 3/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Sure - different methods, hence potential for different results. But again, what if we had 400 years of science confirming /11 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Metamagician
@Metamagician the extent to which given the situation you describe "religious" belief is religious at all, but, well, twitter limitations!)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Yes, true - i.e.,about the Twitter constraints.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Metamagician
@Metamagician I'm now going to be referring to you as "The accommodationist, philosopher, Russell Blackford..." . :) Gotta run. Bye!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Metamagician
@Metamagician@PhilosophyExp Just wanted to say: loved this discussion.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@owenphelps @Metamagician Cool! Thanks. It's an interesting and (suprisingly) complex issue.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.