It would be more accurate to say: "We have evidence that religion and science came into conflict over time." No assumptions are needed.
-
@PhilosophyExp methods MIGHT have produced complementary or mutually reinforcing results. But of course, it didn't turn out that way! /3
@Metamagician True. But because science isn't a set of empirical findings, I think in that situationI'd still want to say that science 1/