It would be more accurate to say: "We have evidence that religion and science came into conflict over time." No assumptions are needed.
@Metamagician If science is a method of inquiry, can't we argue that they've always been in conflict...?
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Potential conflict, I'd say. For actual conflict, you need some actual findings that religious authorities can't stomach. -
@Metamagician I think I'd want to argue that ideas, philosophies, methods, etc., can be in conflict (depends on meaning of "conflict", obv!) -
@PhilosophyExp At one level, I think the bit in brackets says it all. It does depend on the meaning of "conflict". But ... /1
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.