@PhilosophyExp No, because it specifically says it should represent non-belief too!
-
@PhilosophyExp@Metamagician That's fascinating. When does 'representing views' cross over to 'presenting falsehood'? Difficult.
@sjzara @Metamagician It was going to be necessary to have religious representation on the programme (because ethics).
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@Metamagician That's an interesting example. When younger I knew nothing of secular ethics. Only religious ethics /1 -
@PhilosophyExp@Metamagician BBC had certainly not informed me that secular ethics was either possible or reasonable, and mainstream. -
@sjzara@Metamagician You can't have watched Magee's Great Philosophers programme then! :) http://bit.ly/19WaMP2 -
@PhilosophyExp@Metamagician You caught me out there! -
@sjzara@Metamagician Sea of Faith was an interesting set of programmes too: http://bit.ly/19Wb1tr
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.