@PhilosophyExp No, because it specifically says it should represent non-belief too!
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp "as well as those subscribing to non-religious belief systems"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara I suppose that Marxism is a (cluster of) belief system(s), though, or Randian Libertarianism (so-called Objectivism).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Metamagician
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara For whatever that may be worth - I'm not big on belief systems except those that are explicitly incomplete.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Metamagician
@Metamagician@sjzara I think the non-religious systems is a reference to things such as Confucianism (i.e., it's a multicultural thing).1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@Metamagician I admit I do have a tendency to misunderstand the flipping obvious - perhaps that's what's happening here.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sjzara
@sjzara@Metamagician I've sat in on a couple of BBC programme planning meetings. They take that aspect seriously.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@Metamagician That's fascinating. When does 'representing views' cross over to 'presenting falsehood'? Difficult.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@sjzara @Metamagician Well, I was involved in the planning for a test the nation critical thinking/ethics type programme. /1
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@Metamagician In that case I accept your judgement of the interpretation of the mandate.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.