Scientists might be less rejecting of philosophy if there weren't philosophers who dismissed evolution.Where's philosophy's quality control?
@CogitaTuti @sjzara I thought I'd covered that point by adding the "by natural selection" bit! :)
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara Maybe. :-) But the term "natural selection" is vague enough to be confused with evolution itself. At least that's ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara ...what creationists do repeatedly. :-)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara There is an excellent text Jay Gould called "Evolution as fact and as a theory." Almost no scientist doubts ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara ...evolution as fact, the common origin of species and their changes through the ages.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara But what are the main factors of evolutionary mechanisms, of course, disagreements and surveys to be made.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara Unfortunately, this is used to cause confusion, and try to make it appear that "scientists fight against evolution.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@sjzara Here the text of Jay Gould, excellent: http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_fact-and-theory.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.