@Metaphoenix42 @PhilosophyExp @Eshto It's very hard and thick, and phallocratic.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Replying to @SubManUSN
@SubManUSN @Metaphoenix42@Eshto Weber, unless they were a social scientist). So it is difficult. Written for a specialist audience.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp @Metaphoenix42@Eshto So far I haven't had to cross reference much. I'm on page 8 of 282 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SubManUSN
@SubManUSN@philosophyexp @metaphoenix42@eshto Lenin had the same theory, but working class had the epistemic privilege1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaspergregory
@jaspergregory Yes, but Einstein showed there are no privileged frames of reference. I can borrow from other theories too!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SubManUSN
@SubManUSN@PhilosophyExp I would think that the no privileged frame of reference idea can be found in Enlightenment thought1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @SubManUSN
@SubManUSN@PhilosophyExp You might be right, what about Berkeley or Hume?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaspergregory
@jaspergregory@PhilosophyExp Getting out of my comfort zone. I'm just starting to explore philosophy. Cheers!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@SubManUSN @jaspergregory Aristotle can (probably) be seen in those terms. Also, Francis Bacon. And perhaps Descartes. Definitely Locke.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.