@philosophyexp I hope that's not a no :-)
-
-
Replying to @mollydot
@mollydot It's the proportionality of the response that's the issue. This is his speech: http://bit.ly/15fskht . 1/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@philosophyexp I've read parts of it. I'll read it later; just on phne now. 1st thing I read was his response & I didn't think much of it2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@philosophyexp He apologised for his response? Didn't know that. Not following it. Have seen yr tweets,his response & a couple of anti posts1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mollydot
@mollydot He apologises here (but I'm not sure what response you're talking about): http://bit.ly/15fuk9p3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Reading his response now, I can only say: My god, the man's an idiot. Wrong. Illogical. Wrong. Misquote? Uncharitable reading1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mollydot
@PhilosophyExp And that's without having read Watson's post. His post doesn't stand up by itself.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp You don't see *anything* wrong with it? (Excluding Korea remark)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.