@SubManUSN @Metaphoenix42 @Eshto Weber, unless they were a social scientist). So it is difficult. Written for a specialist audience.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp @Metaphoenix42@Eshto So far I haven't had to cross reference much. I'm on page 8 of 282 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SubManUSN
@SubManUSN @Metaphoenix42@Eshto First 8 pages are the most useful. Seriously! It's where she puts down the basic claim.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @SkepticismFirst
@Metaphoenix42
@SubManUSN@Eshto That wouldn't be an entirely daft thing to do! :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Is it plausible to say that these SJWs are simply employing a superficial version of standpoint theory + intersectionality?6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@NotungSchwert Yes. It's a simplified, bastardized version of standpoint theory. Standpoint theory itself was derived from Marx (Lukacs)...6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@NotungSchwert > and of course, Nietzsche basically turned that whole construct on its head w/ "Master/Slave Morality" >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iamcuriousblue
@iamcuriousblue@NotungSchwert ...of the general thesis (which is actually rooted in Lukacs - and Marx).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@NotungSchwert I thought m/s dialectic is what Lukacs was specifically building on, but then I haven't read Lukacs.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@iamcuriousblue @NotungSchwert since I read "History and Class Consciousness".
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.