@SubManUSN @Metaphoenix42 @Eshto Weber, unless they were a social scientist). So it is difficult. Written for a specialist audience.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp @Metaphoenix42@Eshto So far I haven't had to cross reference much. I'm on page 8 of 282 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SubManUSN
@SubManUSN @Metaphoenix42@Eshto First 8 pages are the most useful. Seriously! It's where she puts down the basic claim.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @SkepticismFirst
@Metaphoenix42
@SubManUSN@Eshto That wouldn't be an entirely daft thing to do! :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Is it plausible to say that these SJWs are simply employing a superficial version of standpoint theory + intersectionality?6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SIN_Notung
@NotungSchwert Yes. It's a simplified, bastardized version of standpoint theory. Standpoint theory itself was derived from Marx (Lukacs)...6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @SkepticismFirst
@Metaphoenix42
@NotungSchwert Yeah, and just like most creationists will never have read any Darwin...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
@Metaphoenix42 @NotungSchwert That's okay, you're not a creationist...! ;)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.