@PhilosophyExp Is that the same paper you tweeted out last week, standpoint theory?
-
-
-
@SubManUSN Yes, I'm doing a close reading (i.e., a very slow, re-re-reading). I'm interested in it's logical and rhetorical structure. -
@PhilosophyExp I'm trying to press my way through it. I want to present to my viewers. It won't be soon, though. understand first, vid later -
@SubManUSN It's not an easy piece. Really, it requires knowledge of Marx, Hegel, plus a whole chunk of psychoanalysis. I find it... -
@PhilosophyExp@SubManUSN Problem with these things, there is no stringency. But more like "Apophenic Theorizing" http://youtu.be/folTvNDL08A -
@Aneris23@SubManUSN It has an interesting rhetorical structure. It masquerades as stringent, but it isn't... it's smoke and mirrors.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp What utter rubbish. Most sperm is lost in the act of excessive wanking. Well, mine is anyway. -
.
@Tigzy_J Well quite. But she must know this... I keep thinking it must be allegorical, but, if it is, then it's heavily disguised allegory! -
@PhilosophyExp ...resulting conclusion be that men have genocide on the brain, rather than simply death? -
@Tigzy_J Right. Actually, she seems to endorse the idea that the sperm is a "being", which is... well, bonkers!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you know good papers or books about death and/in masculinity, I would be highly interested
@PhilosophyExp -
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.