@PhilosophyExp It's a sociological term. Makes sense in groups. Most people ignore intersectionality theory.
Or does it belong to aggregates of individuals - social groups? Or maybe it's a property of a social structure? Or it might be relational?
-
-
-
@Dianora_1 So what do you make of the criticisms of say ethnomethologists vis-a-vis the ontological reality of groups?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp I (a non-expert, as you know) use the word as a relational property, but I see SJWs using it as something one possesses. -
@NotungSchwert@PhilosophyExp It's fine when used as a generality not a specific. -
@Dianora_1 I think it could be specific as well, e.g. I'm privileged over John Q. Thirdworld in terms of educational funding.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Intuitively I would say it is a social construct- perhaps a by product of certain internal qualities and/or social status.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Of course I'm probably wrong.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.