This idea that there is an inviolable sociological consensus supporting the SJW's version of gender politics is complete nonsense.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Creationist: Idea of an inviolable scientific consensus supporting evolution is complete nonsense. Facepalm word: inviolable.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Y_Athyco
@PhilosophyExp Removing "inviolable," collapses the "complete nonsense" claim. Who--besides you--claims "inviolable"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Y_Athyco
@YvonneAthyco - and that we just "move on" from these (i.e., they're not up for debate). So spare me the tweet policing, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Just a little more: w/ no @ or RT, I'd give directions to this "something about 'privilege'" included in an *explicit* claim.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Y_Athyco
@PhilosophyExp Great. *Against whom* do you wish not to make that specific a point re "something about 'privilege'" & "settled" & "truths"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Y_Athyco
@PhilosophyExp That's one way of putting out an inviolable argument.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@YvonneAthyco Well, you either think I'm telling the truth or you don't. I don't care. But there's a chance you'll come across the thing...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.