@JDofAndersonia Thanks. Appreciated. But I did screw this one up. (Albeit the substantive points I made were right.)
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
.
@PhilosophyExp @JDofAndersonia It either demonstrates/corroborates something or it doesn't. It's poor evidence for anything. /21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Metamagician
@Metamagician @JDofAndersonia Agreed. The substantive methodological criticisms I made are still in play. It doesn't work as a natural exp.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@metamagician @jdofandersonia apart from a minor misunderstanding, "no experiment" is a worse defence than a bad one2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @JakCharlton
@JakCharlton But, for the reasons I gave last night, it's a terribly flawed as a natural experiment. So yes, in that sense...
7:58 PM - 25 Feb 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.