@JDofAndersonia Thanks. Appreciated. But I did screw this one up. (Albeit the substantive points I made were right.)
-
.
@PhilosophyExp @JDofAndersonia It either demonstrates/corroborates something or it doesn't. It's poor evidence for anything. /2
@Metamagician @JDofAndersonia Agreed. The substantive methodological criticisms I made are still in play. It doesn't work as a natural exp.
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@metamagician @jdofandersonia apart from a minor misunderstanding, "no experiment" is a worse defence than a bad one -
@JakCharlton Yeah. In his claim to causality (i.e., photo led to sharing), he's de facto treating it as if it were a natural experiment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.