.@PhilosophyExp At least there's a reciprocal giving of apologies such as I talk about here. http://skepticink.com/hellfireclub/2013/02/25/norm-geras-and-me-on-apologies/ …
I think he's overreaching in his final paragraph, but yes, his point that he wasn't constructing an experiment is entirely fair. My bad.
-
-
-
@Metamagician I do think I was culpable for not reading Michael's opening couple of paragraphs more carefully. Hence apology, etc. -
.
@PhilosophyExp But not making excuses is to your credit. And it's to Nugent's that he accepts some of the blame for the way he wrote it. /2 -
@Metamagician Thx. It's true the way I read it was framed by PZ's take. But... if you're going to criticize forcefully, as I did, you've...1
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp wait war? As it was a political call to action, the fact it wasn't based on good evidence is ok? -
@JakCharlton Well, right, that's the bit that I think is still wrong, etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@PhilosophyExp Imagine if Ms Watson (the far more powerful & culpable figure) had initiated such a conciliatory exchange with Ms McGraw. -
@Metamagician Thing is, I shouldn't complain about other people's tendentious, uncharitable reading, etc., if I just do it myself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.