@danielwaddell17 First the ladder, then some scaffolding, then wings, then I offer sugar lumps, and hey presto, I mount my trusty steed.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Is it too hard to carry a sense of humour with you? Were just holding up a mirror to them without the slander#atheismplus3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danielwaddell17
@danielwaddell17 It might not be ruled out because it's cruel, but it should at least give pause for thought. No?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@danielwaddell17 How long was the pause before you branded it "vile"? Should we dampen the cruel humour targeting the pope?3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@skepteaser If the power differential is clearly wildly asymmetrical then the moral calculus is clearly different. Hence ridicule Pope.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Sounds fair. I don't attack physical appearance, but I think the amount of bullying (incl.IRL) warrants pope-level ridicule.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@skepteaser Would you think that if you had good reason to think it was affecting the target's mental health? (Just a hypothetical.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp I would refrain. But if the "target" of satire were engaging in vicious campaign of bullying, I'd file it under self-defence.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@skepteaser Or at least, I'd argue that there is certainly a moral calculus to be done in this respect. I'd say there was a duty of care...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@skepteaser And I don't mean people on the FtB side of the fence.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.