Stephanie Zvan is an ignorant bully, but she's also absolutely right that the stuff here is vile, stupid, bollox: http://bit.ly/WdVprB
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp How do you mount that high horse of yours? Do you use a ladder or fly up using your angel wings?#atheismplus1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @danielwaddell17
@danielwaddell17 First the ladder, then some scaffolding, then wings, then I offer sugar lumps, and hey presto, I mount my trusty steed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Is it too hard to carry a sense of humour with you? Were just holding up a mirror to them without the slander#atheismplus3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danielwaddell17
@danielwaddell17 It might not be ruled out because it's cruel, but it should at least give pause for thought. No?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp@danielwaddell17 How long was the pause before you branded it "vile"? Should we dampen the cruel humour targeting the pope?3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
@skepteaser If the power differential is clearly wildly asymmetrical then the moral calculus is clearly different. Hence ridicule Pope.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Sounds fair. I don't attack physical appearance, but I think the amount of bullying (incl.IRL) warrants pope-level ridicule.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@skepteaser Part of what worries me about this sort of thing is that there are no checks & balances in place in terms of impact.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.